Bayer's CropScience unit plans to develop new heat- and drought-resistant wheat traits over the next decade without the use of genetic modification, a top executive said. But Europe, the world's top wheat producer, must overcome its fear of agricultural innovation such as genetically modified (GM) crops or risk undermining its own food security, the division's chief executive officer, Sandra Peterson, told Reuters in an interview.

The German company has announced a series of deals and partnerships to increase its access to wheat seed traits, or "germplasm," as part of its program to develop improved varieties of the world's biggest cereal crop by planted area.

"The thing that has not had enough attention is really thinking about how to use modern breeding techniques to really look at the germplasm pools and find ways to actually improve yields, and to improve the heat and drought tolerance of these crops," Peterson said.

By using marker-assisted breeding techniques, which enable plant breeders to screen huge numbers of seeds for desired traits such as drought-resistance, Petersen said the company will be able to develop new varieties much more quickly.

Anti-Technology

According to extracts of a speech she was due to give at the World Agricultural Forum in Brussels, Peterson warned European Union policy makers that such technological innovations will only be possible in the right regulatory environment.

"Our industry is not concerned that we might run out of innovative ideas to safeguard crops, but we are concerned about the regulatory and political obstacles on the last mile to the market."

Public opposition to genetically modified crops has led several EU governments to ban their cultivation, and at less than 100,000 hectares, GM crop production in Europe is a tiny fraction of the global total.

Recent proposals to reform the EU's €55 billion-a-year farm policy, including plans to make European farmers adopt new environmental practices, went in the wrong direction, she told Reuters.

"Saying you must rotate three crops a year, a certain percentage of your land must be set aside, and some of the other proposals, my sense is that it's a little anti-technology, and the ability of European farmers to feed Europe is reduced as a result."

"It's critically important for Europe to have a different way to think about the role of agriculture in society and the economy here. Unfortunately, the trajectory we're on is not necessarily the right trajectory for the economic health, but also the social health of Europe."